As a photographer, one of my favourite things to do is visit zoos, parks, and similar locations, looking for potential photo opportunities. One of my local parks has a greenhouse, in which several exotic plants are displayed. One of the signs within reads "Believed to have spread from Iran, Syria and Palestine 6,000 years ago, it was first cultivated in Greece. There it was known as 'the tree which feeds the children.' There are fossilised olives 60,000 years old. A tree's potential life expectancy could be 300 years, and the oldest is claimed to be 5,000 years." This is a fairly typical Evolutionised exhibit, which allows us to play a little game. We can separate facts from speculation.
Let's begin with the phrase "Believed to have spread from Iran, Syria and Palestine 6,000 years ago..." Notice that word "believed". This indicates that whoever wrote the sign doesn't actually know this to be a fact. They want you to keep it in mind, but because of that word "believed", it won't affect their worldview if it turns out this belief is false.
"...it was first cultivated in Greece."
This is a fact. Or at least, it is more than just speculation. This claim relies on actual historical evidence. We have no confirmed records of olives being cultivated before they were cultivated in Greece. Therefore, it is safe to assume Greece was the first country to cultivate olives.
"There it was known as 'the tree which feeds the children.'"
Again, this is based on evidence. What exactly that evidence is, I don't know. I'm not an expert. But it would be highly unethical for a historian to just make up a saying and attribute it to an ancient culture, so I am forced to assume there is some kind of ancient Grecian writing in which the saying can be found.
"There are fossilised olives..."
This is known. If someone says "there are no fossilised olives", you can present them with a fossilised olive, and if they are rational, they will admit they were wrong.
"...60,000 years old."
This is not known. There is no reliable way to demonstrate the age of a fossil.
"A tree's potential life expectancy could be 300 years..."
Theoretically, this could be known. I wish to reiterate, I'm not an expert, but as olives have been cultivated for so long, it is not inconceivable that those who cultivate them might have a rough idea of how long they live. Obviously, humans don't live that long, so it's not like someone planted one and watched them grow from a seed until they died, but information can be passed through generations.
"...and the oldest is claimed to be 5,000 years."
This contains another "weasel word". It is claimed, but it is not known. If contrary evidence comes to light, nothing changes.
You can play this game with virtually any Evolutionist text. Exhibits, news articles, even whole books, contain all sorts of weasel words, speculation, and although it doesn't seem to be the case in this example, sometimes outright lies. When I first came up with this experiment (which it seems other Creationists beat me to a long time ago), I actually decided to just cross out speculation, even if this required me to cut out a part of a sentence (see more here). When I did this, the extract still made perfect sense.
This explains why Evolution appears so necessary. It is inserted, without justification, into places it just isn't needed. Does this sign need any of the speculation? No. In fact, there is plenty of factual information they could easily have included instead. What is an olive's scientific name? How is it classified? Is it used for medicine, or just food? What is its conservation status? What is its impact on its local environment? These are all things that would be far better explained than myths about olives having a history that far exceeds the actual age of the Earth.
But of course, Evolution has an agenda. It needs to remain relevant because it is a tool designed to deny our accountability to God. Unfortunately, this denial is delusional. We may be able to temporarily forget that we are quickly heading to our graves, but one day we will be forced to remember. And this reminder will not be pleasant.
While there is nothing we can do to avoid our inevitable death, there is something we can do about what happens on the other side of it. As sinners, every single one of us deserves to receive what is called the "second death". That is, our immortal souls are separated from God forever, receiving eternal punishment according to our works. However, our Creator is not willing that we should receive this. Rather, He would prefer we leave this life and enter the next one. To that end, He sent His Son, Jesus, to be born of a virgin, live a sinless life, and die a sinner's death. On the cross, Jesus took the full penalty for our sins, allowing us to receive the full reward for His righteousness.
There is a condition, however. We must confess Him as Lord, and believe He rose from the dead. Not to worry, however. This is not just something "believed" or "claimed" to have happened. Rather, we have a rather solid historical record of this fact. Eyewitnesses, inspired by God, recount their own experiences with Christ, including His death, and His resurrection. If we were to cross out all speculation in the Bible, we would still have the exact same Bible.